Presented by Emily Maitlis & Martha Kearney
Publish and Be Damned?
At the heart of tonight's programme lie just 25 sentences that we may never get to see as they remain - for now - shrouded in secrecy, on the orders of the UK government.
They detail what happened to a terrorist suspect in custody. The British government has refused to make them public saying they breach our intelligence relationship with the United States and therefore our national security long term.
Tonight, the High Court ruled that it was overwhelmingly in the public interest to publish them.
Tonight, we ask Mr Miliband what he makes of the outright rejection of his argument by Britain's top judges.
Gaza 'war crimes'
"No, we didn't abstain - we didn't vote."
Confused? We were. Apparently, there is a key difference between the UK government abstaining and not voting when the UN Human Rights Council backed a report into the Israeli offensive in Gaza.
Earlier I put it to David Miliband the position amounted to 'mealy mouthed fence sitting'.
You can see his response to that this evening.
Also tonight, we'll be asking how much sympathy there is here for the position of Geert Wilders - the Dutch politician who calls the Koran a fascist document that should be banned and says he is against Islamic culture and Islamisation of the West.
Should he have been allowed into Britain? Was he war mongering in seeking to come here or demonstrating that the UK is indeed, a country that can tolerate dissenting voices in the name of freedom of speech?
And the man who is reportedly twice as successful as the CIA in making predictions.
Bruce Bueno de Mesquita uses maths, science and the logic of brazen self interest to see into the future.
Does it work? Could he tell us how the Israeli Palestinian peace talks will end up or indeed what the outcome of a UK general election would be?
Tell us what you fancy finding out - within reason - and we'll ask him how he would come to his conclusions.
Do join us tonight at 10.30pm on BBC Two.
Emily